Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/28/1994

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Citations

651 A.2d 1096
539 Pa. 212
1994 Pa. LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that acquittal of sole alleged co-conspirator does not per se preclude conviction of remaining defendant, even if defendants are jointly tried
holding that, generally, “an acquittal cannot be interpreted as a specific finding in relation to some of the evidence”
holding that acquittal of sole alleged co-conspirator does not per se preclude conviction of remaining defendant, even if defendants are jointly tried
holding that “consistency in verdicts in a joint trial for conspiracy is not necessarily required”
stating that “the convicted conspirator can always challenge his conviction upon sufficiency of the evidence grounds”
holding even where co-defendants are tried together inconsistent verdicts alone is not grounds for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.