Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/7/1992

Commonwealth v. Phillips

Citations

601 A.2d 816
411 Pa. Super. 329
1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that prior acquittal of sole alleged co-conspirator in separate trial does not preclude finding subsequently tried co-conspirator guilty of conspiracy
only those issues raised in post-verdict motions and concise statement of matters complained of on appeal are preserved for appellate review
only those issues raised in post-verdict motions and concise statement of matters complained of on appeal are preserved for appellate review
appellant must demonstrate the witnesses would have provided material evidence at the time of trial and he must establish the manner in which the witnesses would have been helpful to his case
permissible to challenge person employed as drug counselor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Tamilia, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.