Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/9/2002
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 788 A.2d 628
- 367 Md. 418
- 2002 Md. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]hus, despite the acquittal of all of the respondent’s co-conspirators in a prior trial, the respondent’s conviction for conspiracy must stand.”
- All co-defendants were acquitted of conspiracy to commit murder, for which defendant was subsequently convicted in a separate trial. The “rule of consistency” did not apply to verdicts issued in separate trials.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-09· cited 66×
- State v. Payne & BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-11· cited 37×
- Oliveira v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-01-20· cited 36×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-11· cited 35×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-13· cited 29×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-02· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. ResendeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-01-03· cited 15×
- Toms v. Calvary Assembly of God, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-02-29· cited 13×
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-10-20· cited 12×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-02· cited 11×
- Grueff v. VitoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-28· cited 7×
- Town of Upper Marlboro v. Prince George's Cnty CnclCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-01· cited 7×
- Price v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-25· cited 6×
- Jackson v. SollieCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-19· cited 6×
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-11-01· cited 5×
- In Re GARY T.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-06· cited 3×
- Sequiera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-04-01· cited 3×
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-30
- Tubaya v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-01
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,102×
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 851×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-05-08· cited 593×
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-18· cited 231×
- United States v. Ray Thomas, United States of America v. Wayne Graham MasonFourth Circuit· 1990-04-05· cited 170×
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-14· cited 129×
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-24· cited 129×
- United States v. Patrice Mespoulede, A/K/A \Patrice Fabre\Second Circuit· 1979-04-10· cited 116×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-08-27· cited 116×
- State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court· 1983-06-02· cited 112×
- People v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 111×
- Monoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-05· cited 103×
- Delo v. NewlonSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 95×
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-21· cited 93×
- United States v. Alberto Espinosa-CerpaFifth Circuit· 1980-11-12· cited 89×
- United States v. George BucuvalasFirst Circuit· 1990-07-25· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.