Commonwealth v. Fremd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to venue was waived when it was only raised in the lower court as a challenge to jurisdiction
• concluding that the rule of consistency “has basically been overruled by” prior cases decided by both the Pennsylvania Superior and Supreme Courts
• holding, after noting challenge to a county’s jurisdiction over the case was meritless due to the court’s statewide jurisdiction over criminal cases, that a challenge to the propriety of venue in that county was waived pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 302(a
• when the Commonwealth objects to appellant’s failure to include Rule 2119(f) statement in brief, this Court is precluded from addressing the claim on appeal
• failure to raise argument issue in statement of questions involved results in waiver
• challenge to venue waived for failing to raise issue before lower court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).