Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bristow

Citations

  • 538 A.2d 1343
  • 372 Pa. Super. 48
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an argument that testimony was unreliable is irrelevant to sufficiency claim
  • sentencing court cannot consider defendant’s pri- or convictions as aggravating circumstance since that factor has already been included in computation of defendant's prior record score under the sentencing guidelines
  • sufficiency analysis does not permit an examination of credibility, reliability, or weight of the evidence
  • sufficiency analysis does not permit an examination of credibility, reliability, or weight of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Olszewski and Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.