Commonwealth v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a]n interpretation of the language in a section of a statute must remain consistent throughout the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Pantalion
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-26· cited 116×
• Commonwealth v. Ryan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-12· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Hughes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-14· cited 27×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Shamberger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-07· cited 280×
• Commonwealth v. Berryman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-01· cited 94×
• In Re Investigating Grand Jury
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-14· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Cluck
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Gaddis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Lurie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-24· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Lenhoff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-28· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Muller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-12· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Bristow
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-15· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Fouse
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-08· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Stevens
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-10· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Sargent
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-22· cited 7×