Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Citations

  • 460 A.2d 1149
  • 314 Pa. Super. 298
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “while it may be the better practice to have a different judge preside over trial than preside over pre-trial proceedings, such a practice is not constitutionally required”
  • allowing victim’s testimony on remarks by a third person because information contained therein explained events and course of conduct that preceded appellant’s arrest and was part of its history
  • where judge presides at pre-trial suppression hearing, he need not recuse himself as fact finder at trial unless inadmissible evidence of a highly prejudicial nature was presented at the suppression hearing
  • admission of out-of-court statement that set wheels in motion for defendant’s capture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, McEwen, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.