Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 486 A.2d 441
  • 336 Pa. Super. 628
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that appellant’s sentences for attempted burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary violate section 906, because they arise from conduct directed to the commission of the same crime
  • vacating separate sentence imposed for conviction of conspiracy to commit burglary pursuant to Section 906, when defendant was also convicted and sentenced for attempted burglary
  • appellant’s sentences for attempted burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary merge under § 906
  • a trial judge sitting as fact finder is presumed to ignore prejudicial evidence
  • a trial judge sitting as fact finder is presumed to ignore prejudicial evidence
  • a trial judge sitting as fact finder is presumed to ignore prejudicial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.