Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/11/1989
In Re Quick
Citations
- 559 A.2d 42
- 384 Pa. Super. 412
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that such an assignment of cases benefits the parent because the district court judge will have the benefit of recall of the juvenile hearing to ensure \the record is full and complete so that termination will not be granted if the agency is overreaching\
- explaining that such an assignment of cases benefits the parent because the district court judge will have the benefit of recall of the juvenile hearing to ensure \the record is full and complete so that termination will not be granted if the agency is overreaching\
- stating “[i]t is unsupportable that an experienced trial judge is incapable of making factual determinations and legal findings in regard to the same child at different hearings . . . without being subject to bias or prejudice”
- Termination would meet needs and welfare of the child as removal from foster home would upset children's need for stability
- Termination would meet needs and welfare of the child as removal from foster home would upset children’s need for stability
- where appropriate treatment would require several years of intensive therapy, parent had not availed herself of treatment, and there is substantial likelihood treatment would be unsuccessful, termination of parental rights was justified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Brosky, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re V.E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-30· cited 297×
- In re Interest of S.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-13· cited 262×
- In re S.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23· cited 119×
- In the Interest of M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-22· cited 65×
- In the Interest of SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-09· cited 59×
- State in Interest of MLCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-08-13· cited 44×
- In re J.S.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-20· cited 41×
- In Re the Adoption of B.G.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-17· cited 32×
- In Re Adoption of B.J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-14· cited 31×
- Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-06-26· cited 15×
- In the Interest of G.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-20· cited 14×
- In Re SHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-13· cited 2×
- In the Int. of: M.K.L., Appeal of: Phila. DHSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-02-24· cited 2×
- In Re JSWSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-20
- In Re SMBSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23
- In Re VESuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-30
- In Re: Order Amending Rules 1120 and 1608 of the Rules of Juvenile Court ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-09
- In Re: Order Approving the Amendment of Rule 1608 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Juvenile Court ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-06-14
- In the Interest of: N.M., Appeal of: Q.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-24
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In Re Adoption of JJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-26· cited 195×
- In re T.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-28· cited 111×
- In Re Adoption by ShivesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-12· cited 78×
- In Re Adoption of HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-26· cited 54×
- In Re the Adoption of G.T.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-20· cited 53×
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 42×
- In Re Adoption of Michael JCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-28· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-06· cited 34×
- In Re Adoption of Faith M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-06· cited 24×
- In Re AngrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-05· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. BristowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-15· cited 18×
- In re J.G.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-28· cited 18×
- Baskin & Sears v. Edward J. Boyle Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-20· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.