Skip to main content

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney

Citations

  • 427 Pa. 599
  • 235 A.2d 349
  • 1967 Pa. LEXIS 525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding of ineffectiveness cannot be made unless alternatives not chosen offer potential for success substantially greater than tactics used; therefore, if there was no reasonable basis for counsel's decision, his decisions were prejudicial to client
  • finding of ineffectiveness cannot be made unless alternatives not chosen offer potential for success substantially greater than tactics used; therefore, if there was no reasonable basis for counsel’s decision, his decisions were prejudicial to client
  • ineffectiveness review involves \an examination of counsel's stewardship of the now challenged proceedings in light of the available alternatives\
  • ineffectiveness review involves “an examination of counsel’s stewardship of the now challenged proceedings in light of the available alternatives”
  • ineffectiveness review involves “an examination of counsel’s stewardship of the now challenged proceedings in light of the available alternatives”
  • ineffectiveness review involves \an examination of counsel's stewardship of the now challenged proceedings in light of the available alternatives\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.