Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/11/2011

Commonwealth v. Borrin

Citations

12 A.3d 466
2011 Pa. Super. 10
2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5
2011 WL 80477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding trial court has inherent power to correct patent and obvious mistake in sentencing order, even beyond the 30 day time limit provided for in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505
stating that “we cannot accept the trial judge’s proclamation of his own intentions because those intentions were only known to the trial judge himself and do not appear on the face of the sentencing transcript.”
refusing to permit alteration to the written sentencing order outside of the framework of Section 5505 where \the trial judge's intentions ... were not clearly and unequivocally expressed at sentencing.\
“[A] trial court has the inherent, common-law authority to correct ‘clear clerical errors’ in its orders[,] even after the expiration of the 30 day time limitation set forth in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505[.]”
“[A] trial court has the inherent, common-law authority to correct ‘clear clerical errors’ in its orders[,] even after the expiration of the 30 day time limitation set forth in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Musmanno, Bender, Bowes, Donohue, Shogan, Allen, Olson, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.