United States v. Steven A. Silvers, (Two Cases)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that resentencing on reinstated conviction did not violate Double Jeopardy because the defendant was simply placed in the position he would have been in had there been no error
• defendant who collaterally attacked CCE conviction could not have expectation of finality in earlier vacating of conspiracy conviction, considering vacating was due to interdependent nature of those two charges
• legitimate expectation of finality where defendant had completed serving sentence
• “when a party files a timely notice of appeal followed by a timely Rule 59 motion, the notice of appeal is tolled and does not become effective to confer jurisdiction on the court of appeals until the entry of an order disposing of the Rule 59 motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).