Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/2/2007

Commonwealth v. Robinson

Citations

931 A.2d 15
2007 Pa. Super. 230
2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declaring that a claim that convictions should have merged for sentencing purposes constitutes a “nonwaivable challenge to the legality of sentence”
holding three convictions of corruption of minors based upon three separate incidents occurring over the course of three years did not merge for sentencing purposes
finding that a claim of vindictiveness by the trial court when sentencing a defendant does not implicate the legality of the sentence
stating that if a defendant fails to include an issue in his Rule 2119(f) statement, and the Commonwealth objects, then the issue is waived and this Court may not review the claim
finding waiver of the appellant’s discretionary sentencing claim because he had failed to include the claim in his Rule 2119(f) statement and the Commonwealth objected to this failure
stating miscalculation of offense gravity score constitutes challenge to discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Stevens, Musmanno, Melvin, Lally-Green, Todd, Klein, Bender, Bowes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.