United States v. Donald Robert Moyles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering only the formal oral pronouncement of sentence and holding that it was internally ambiguous
• “[A] variance between an orally imposed sentence and a commitment order must be controlled by the terms of the pronounced sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).