Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ellsworth

Citations

  • 97 A.3d 1255
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 167
  • 2014 WL 3919729
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the power to change sentences “is vested with the sentencing court,” which can amend clerical errors or patent and obvious mistakes beyond the statutory deadline for sentence modifications
  • stating, “a defendant is not entitled to receive credit against more than one sentence for the same time served”, i.e., double credit
  • stating, “a defendant is not entitled to receive credit against more than one sentence for the same time served, i.e., double credit
  • stating, “a defendant is not entitled to receive credit against more than one sentence for the same time served.” (citations, internal quotation marks, and brackets omitted)
  • “This Court has held that a defendant is not entitled to ‘receiv[e] credit against more than one sentence for the same time served.’”
  • “This Court has held that a defendant is not entitled to receiv[e] credit against more than one sentence for the same time served.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Shogan, Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.