United States v. Anthony F. Daddino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant acquired a legitimate expectation of finality in his sentence where he had served his sentence, paid fines and restitution, and only a portion of his probation and supervised release remained
• noting that Rule 36 “does not apply to errors made by the court itself’
• noting that, although typically the oral sentence controls when there is a conflict between the written and oral sentences, a written sentence can serve to correct ambiguities in the oral sentence
• finding that completion of incarceration portion of sentence precluded any increase of it
• defendant acquired a legit- imate expectation of finality because defendant had com- pleted service of his incarceration and paid all fines and restitution
• defendant acquired a legitimate expectation of finality because defendant had completed service of his incarceration and paid all fines and restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).