Commonwealth v. Berry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We also recognize hybrid representation, or a defendant’s ability to proceed pro se with standby counsel, controlling counsel’s role in the litigation.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chapman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-04-21· cited 28×
• Major v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-03-10· cited 14×
• Gibson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 13×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Godinez v. Moran
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 100×
• Hill v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-01-22· cited 69×
• Moore v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1982-06-15· cited 55×
• Wake v. Barker
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1974-10-11· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Lewis
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1977-03-11· cited 18×