Commonwealth v. Berry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commonwealth not entitled to extension where only proof of due diligence was hearing judge's statement that case could not be reached because no jury trial rooms were available
• Commonwealth not entitled to extension where only proof of due diligence was hearing judge’s statement that case could not be reached because no jury trial rooms were available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Suggs
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-17· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Perry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Levitt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-15· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Bright
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-06· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Tate
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-21· cited 7×