O'ROURKE v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petty acts of intimidation and harassment by supervisors did not constitute retaliation against employee’s terms of employment
• concluding that petty acts of intimidation and harassment by supervisors did not constitute retaliation against employee’s terms of employment
• holding that plaintiff who reported coworkers and supervisors committed “theft and mismanagement” reported wrongdoing for purposes of the Whistleblower Law
• holding that an employer may rebut a prima facie case of retaliation by demonstrating that it would have taken the same adverse employment action absent the employee’s good faith report of wrongdoing
• indicating that statutory words should be interpreted with reference to the context in which they appear
• indicating that statutory words should be interpreted with reference to the context in which they appear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).