Skip to main content
· 12/15/2009

Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Citations

  • 985 A.2d 678
  • 603 Pa. 452
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “where the legislature includes specific language in one section of the statute and excludes it from another, the language should not be implied where excluded”
  • where the legislature includes specific language in one section of a statute and excludes it from another, the language should not be implied where excluded
  • “where a section of a statute contains a given provision, the omission of such a provision from a similar section is significant to show a different legislative intent”
  • “[W]here a section of a statute contains a given provision, the omission of such a provision from a similar section is significant to show a different legislative intent.”
  • “[W]here a section of a statute contains a given provision, the omission of such a provision from a similar section is significant to show a different legislative intent.”
  • “[W]here a section of a statute contains a given provision, the omission of such a provision from a similar section is significant to show a different legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.