Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Citations

  • 149 A.3d 349
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 224
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 591
  • 2016 WL 6091583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]f the Commonwealth objects to the appellant’s failure to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f), the sentencing claim is waived for purposes of review”
  • explaining that where the Commonwealth objects to an omission of a Rule 2119(f) statement, “the sentencing claim is waived for purposes of review”
  • stating that when challenging a discretionary aspect of sentencing, an appellant must include a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f), and if the Commonwealth objects to the appellant’s failure to do so, the sentencing claim is waived for purposes of appellate review
  • stating that when challenging a discretionary aspect of sentencing, an appellant must include a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f), and if the Commonwealth objects to the appellant's failure to do so, the sentencing claim is waived for purposes of appellate review
  • stating if appellant fails to include Rule 2119(f) statement in appellate brief and Commonwealth objects, appellant has waived discretionary aspects of sentencing challenge
  • “If the Commonwealth objects to the appellant’s failure to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f), the sentencing claim is waived for purposes of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Dubow, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.