Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/3/1975
Comi v. State
Citations
- 338 A.2d 918
- 26 Md. App. 511
- 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- that informant had given truthful and accurate information regarding other criminal cases to affiant and other officers, and affiant had independently verified information furnished by informant, sufficiently established informant’s credibility
- informant had previously provided accurate information to other police officers beside affiant
- although trial court erred in submitting particular charge of receiving stolen goods to the jury, error was corrected by the jury verdict of acquittal as to that count and did not affect the remaining counts
- double hearsay approved but Aguilar test was not met
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orth, Gilbert, Lowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LairWashington Supreme Court· 1981-06-18· cited 101×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-24· cited 77×
- State v. WibergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 53×
- Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-09-20· cited 52×
- State v. AlgerIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-06· cited 51×
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- State v. DaleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-04-19· cited 38×
- Kimbrough v. Giant Food, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-05· cited 22×
- Vandegrift v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-04· cited 18×
- State v. MalkinCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-03-09· cited 16×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-08-09· cited 15×
- Wantland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-05-09· cited 13×
- People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-05-13· cited 12×
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-06· cited 11×
- Barber v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-16· cited 8×
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-06· cited 5×
- Pearson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-07· cited 4×
- Hennessy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-18· cited 3×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-31· cited 1×
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-04-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-01-02· cited 101×
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-04-30· cited 51×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-07-03· cited 50×
- Anglin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-03-14· cited 49×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-16· cited 36×
- United States v. Irving RichFifth Circuit· 1969-03-21· cited 32×
- Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-07-27· cited 32×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-08· cited 28×
- Ott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-16· cited 26×
- Jennings v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-12-10· cited 25×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-07-19· cited 17×
- Baumgartner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-20· cited 16×
- State v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-07-30· cited 15×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-07-03· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.