Skip to main content

Anglin v. State

Citations

  • 227 A.2d 364
  • 1 Md. App. 85
  • 1967 Md. App. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a six month lapse between the theft of property and its discovery is not too great to apply the rule that recent possession of stolen goods is evidence of guilt
  • possession of items of stolen jewelry for more than six months
  • possession of items of stolen jewelry for more than six months
  • jewelry box, earrings, and miscellaneous jewelry: one month and six months
  • “[T]he appellant’s possession of the property ivas recent and exclusive so as to create an inference of his guilt, in the absence of a reasonable explanation showing his possession was otherwise acquired than by the particular burglaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson, Dyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.