Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/14/1967
Anglin v. State
Citations
- 227 A.2d 364
- 1 Md. App. 85
- 1967 Md. App. LEXIS 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a six month lapse between the theft of property and its discovery is not too great to apply the rule that recent possession of stolen goods is evidence of guilt
- possession of items of stolen jewelry for more than six months
- possession of items of stolen jewelry for more than six months
- jewelry box, earrings, and miscellaneous jewelry: one month and six months
- “[T]he appellant’s possession of the property ivas recent and exclusive so as to create an inference of his guilt, in the absence of a reasonable explanation showing his possession was otherwise acquired than by the particular burglaries.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson, Dyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-24· cited 77×
- United States v. Alphonso T. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1970-09-04· cited 65×
- Russell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1978-07-19· cited 64×
- Frey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-31· cited 57×
- Buford Linwood St. Clair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-08-11· cited 55×
- Sizemore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-12-04· cited 37×
- Gamble v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-10-24· cited 37×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-16· cited 36×
- Morris E. Anglin, Jr. v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionFourth Circuit· 1971-03-29· cited 34×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-02· cited 34×
- Gerstein v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-10-29· cited 30×
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 228Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-07· cited 27×
- Carwell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-09-14· cited 26×
- Comi v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-03· cited 25×
- Kleinbart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-10-16· cited 23×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-04· cited 22×
- Kimbrough v. Giant Food, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-06-05· cited 22×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-07-02· cited 22×
- Burns v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-02-27· cited 17×
- Sparkman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-03· cited 16×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-11-21· cited 78×
- Butz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-12-10· cited 56×
- Edwardsen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-06-20· cited 54×
- Debinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-02-08· cited 46×
- Lonnie Robert Bryant v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1958-02-28· cited 38×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-07· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.