Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/24/1977

State v. Wilson

Citations

367 A.2d 1223
279 Md. 189
1977 Md. LEXIS 892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a search illegal when police observations were insuffi cient to support a probable cause determination that goods were stolen
explaining that the “immediately apparent” element, “in essence, amounts to a requirement that police have probable cause to believe the evidence is incriminating before they seize it”
prohibiting use of any evidence seized outside the warrant unless it is “immediately apparent to the police that they have evidence of crime before them”
prohibiting use of any evidence seized outside the warrant unless it is “immediately apparent to the police that they have evidence of crime before them”
prohibiting use of any evidence seized outside the warrant unless it is \immediately apparent to the police that they have evidence of crime before them\
considering whether officer obtained defendant’s express consent to search through coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.