Comi v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• that informant had given truthful and accurate information regarding other criminal cases to affiant and other officers, and affiant had independently verified information furnished by informant, sufficiently established informant’s credibility
• informant had previously provided accurate information to other police officers beside affiant
• although trial court erred in submitting particular charge of receiving stolen goods to the jury, error was corrected by the jury verdict of acquittal as to that count and did not affect the remaining counts
• double hearsay approved but Aguilar test was not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).