· 6/5/1975
Kimbrough v. Giant Food, Inc.
Citations
- 339 A.2d 688
- 26 Md. App. 640
- 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- When facts are disputed or more than one inference can be drawn, issue of probable cause must be submitted to the jury
- When facts are disputed or more than one inference can be drawn, issue of probable cause must be submitted to the jury
- where Kimbrough, an employee, gave an “incredible” explanation for his conduct in leaving store with groceries that had been mislaid by a customer, probable cause for shoplifting existed as a matter of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orth, Davidson, Melvin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.