Skip to main content
· 6/5/1975

Kimbrough v. Giant Food, Inc.

Citations

  • 339 A.2d 688
  • 26 Md. App. 640
  • 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • When facts are disputed or more than one inference can be drawn, issue of probable cause must be submitted to the jury
  • When facts are disputed or more than one inference can be drawn, issue of probable cause must be submitted to the jury
  • where Kimbrough, an employee, gave an “incredible” explanation for his conduct in leaving store with groceries that had been mislaid by a customer, probable cause for shoplifting existed as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orth, Davidson, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.