Skip to main content

Cockerham v. State

Citations

  • 933 P.2d 537
  • 1997 Alas. LEXIS 27
  • 1997 WL 71841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying defense request for in camera review where relevance of victim's juvenile record was \highly tenuous\
  • denying defense request for in camera review where relevance of victim's juvenile record was \highly tenuous\
  • \[W]e generally review rulings on discovery for an abuse of discretion.\
  • trial court's factual decisions reversed only if clearly erroneous
  • existence of right of confrontation at sentencing \is debatable\
  • existence of right of confrontation at sentencing “is debatable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.