Nathan v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in declining to apply the exclusionary rule, the absence of evidence of persistent, purposeful violations of the statute
• concl uding that a violation of the ADA did not trigger the exclusionary r ule because it did not necessarily impair a deaf defendant’s ability to exe rcise his constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).