Skip to main content

Hamilton v. State

Citations

  • 771 P.2d 1358
  • 1989 Alas. App. LEXIS 40
  • 1989 WL 35047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the desirability of telephone conference calls as a means of holding hearings, but reversing because of the manner in which the particular hearing was held
  • an appellate court is to affirm a sentencing court's decision unless the sentence is clearly mistaken
  • accepting the use of verified hearsay information at sentencing
  • accepting the use of verified hearsay information at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.