Skip to main content

Booth v. State

Citations

  • 251 P.3d 369
  • 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 29
  • 2011 WL 1643245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a trial court's findings of historical fact are reviewed under the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review
  • determining that “a defendant must present a factual predicate for their discovery request — either pointing to facts already within the record, or making an offer of proof that provides the evidentiary foundation for the request”
  • defendant entitled to in camera review if defendant shows “that if the requested personnel files contain the sort of information described in the defendant’s motion, this information would be relevant to the defendant’s guilt or innocence” given facts and case theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.