Court of Appeals of Alaska· 4/29/2011
Booth v. State
Citations
- 251 P.3d 369
- 2011 Alas. App. LEXIS 29
- 2011 WL 1643245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a trial court's findings of historical fact are reviewed under the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review
- determining that “a defendant must present a factual predicate for their discovery request — either pointing to facts already within the record, or making an offer of proof that provides the evidentiary foundation for the request”
- defendant entitled to in camera review if defendant shows “that if the requested personnel files contain the sort of information described in the defendant’s motion, this information would be relevant to the defendant’s guilt or innocence” given facts and case theories
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court· 2012-10-01· cited 417×
- Tomal v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-31· cited 18×
- Simone H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-07· cited 13×
- Heynen v. FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-02-01· cited 9×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-02-24· cited 4×
- N.G. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-12-14· cited 4×
- Joseph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2013-12-13· cited 4×
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-12-18· cited 3×
- Christopher R. Stacy v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-11-05· cited 3×
- M.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-09-23· cited 3×
- Saepharn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-08-07· cited 1×
- Mayuyo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-06-02· cited 1×
- Alvarez-Perdomo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-06-22· cited 1×
- Adrian T. Olmstead v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-11-06· cited 1×
- Simone H. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-07
- John Robert Douglas v. State of Alaska, John Robert Douglas v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-03-17
- Jerry McCavit and Brenda McCavit v. Randy Lacher, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Louis LacherAlaska Supreme Court· 2024-09-06
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-12-17· cited 590×
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
- United States v. Ronald DriscollSixth Circuit· 1992-09-02· cited 118×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-12-07· cited 95×
- Smithart v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-09-24· cited 71×
- Schmid v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-18· cited 65×
- R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-07-29· cited 48×
- Jones v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-03-16· cited 47×
- Carman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-01-28· cited 42×
- Turner v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-05-05· cited 39×
- Gunnerud v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-05-16· cited 37×
- Mathis v. MeyeresAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-02-10· cited 33×
- March v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-10-01· cited 32×
- Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 29×
- State v. AinsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-02-04· cited 26×
- Braaten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 25×
- Dana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-01-22· cited 25×
- State v. AcinelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-24· cited 22×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-11-15· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.