Nukapigak v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “a bare accusation or the mere fact of arrest is not sufficient to support a conclusion that a defendant has previously engaged in criminal conduct”
• ruling that \a bare accusation or the mere fact of arrest is not sufficient to support a conclusion that a defendant has previously engaged in criminal conduct\
• 24-year-old sentenced to concurrent 6-year and 3-year terms, respectively, for rape and assault with a deadly weapon, prior record consisted of 3 misdemeanors
• 24-year-old sentenced to concurrent 6-year and 3-year terms, respectively, for rape and assault with a deadly weapon, prior record consisted of 3 misdemeanors
• courts may consider \verified instances of past antisocial behavior\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).