Skip to main content

Elson v. State

Citations

  • 633 P.2d 292
  • 1981 Alas. App. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s act of raising “cocaine snifter” vial to streetlight to better inspect its contents did not remove it from “plain view” analysis
  • affirming the district court’s decision allowing the state’s chemist to testify at the sentencing hearing by telephone where defense counsel had a copy of the chemist’s report and the chemist was testifying to that report
  • chemist permitted to testify in sentencing hearing by telephone as to contents of lab report where defense counsel already had copy of report
  • exclusionary rule ordinarily does not require suppression of illegally seized evidence in a sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.