Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 4/11/1997

Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 37 Fed. Cl. 663
  • 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,114
  • 1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 117
  • 1997 WL 178006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Court should not substitute its judgment for that of the agency in bid protest matters
  • holding that the Court should not substitute its judgment for the agency’s judgment
  • “[w]hile the court is not bound by a determination of the GAO, the court may rely upon such a decision for general guidance to the extent it is reasonable and persuasive in light of the administrative record”
  • “[contracting officials’] discretion is especially broad in negotiated procurements”
  • using old implied contract theory
  • reciting the GAO statute’s definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Futey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

108 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.