Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 2/22/2000

Cube Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 46 Fed. Cl. 368
  • 2000 U.S. Claims LEXIS 37
  • 2000 WL 283844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the determination of the relative desirability and technical adequacy of proposals is primarily a matter of agency discretion”
  • stating that “[w]hen the solicitation clearly calls for the items in question, as here, it is not incumbent on the government to unduly assist or ‘spoon-feed’ an offeror”
  • noting that economic harm to awardee should be considered
  • “[T]he determination of the relative desirability and technical adequacy of proposals is primarily a matter of agency discretion, which we will not disturb unless it is shown to be without a reasonable basis or inconsistent with the stated evaluation criteria.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.