Chang v. Cargill, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]o reasonable person would have relied on representations found in a handbook that were disclaimed in the very same handbook.”
• generalized assertions made in course of interview that employee would have opportunities to develop trading skills not kind of definitive promise that would support claim of promissory estoppel binding employer to provide training program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).