Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of evidence in civil case was not reversible error unless it unfairly prejudiced substantial right of complaining party
• holding, without referencing § 20-209, that where plaintiff asserts claims of both libel and false light invasion of privacy based on same publication, false light claim is subsumed within defamation claim and is not separately actionable
• because plaintiff was not licensed to practice law in Nebraska, his appeal is a nullity
• the prohibition on representation by a layperson applies to entities such as corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, and trusts
• comparing limited liability companies to corporations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).