Skip to main content
· 2/13/1986

Corum v. Farm Credit Services

Citations

  • 628 F. Supp. 707
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating employee would have “job security” did not constitute clear and definite promise
  • stating employee would have \job security\ did not constitute clear and definite promise
  • abruptly firing plaintiff after years of loyal service and requiring him to clean out his desk and leave immediately was not outrageous conduct
  • statement to employee who said he would only accept offer of permanent employment deemed an offer
  • plaintiff must show more than \lost opportunity to accrue additional benefits\ to sustain § 510 claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacLAUGHLIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.