Skip to main content
· 7/14/1997

Suzanne Harris v. Secretary, United States Department of the Army

Citations

  • 119 F.3d 1313
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 873
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 78
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17514
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,831
  • 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165
  • 1997 WL 384618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court of appeals reviews district court findings as if there had been no advisory jury
  • court of appeals reviews district court findings as if there had been no advisory jury
  • “To establish a prima facie case of retaliation, [the employee] needed to show: 1
  • “To establish a prima facie case of retaliation, [the employee] needed to show: 1
  • “When a district court submits a claim to an advisory jury, the court is free to accept or reject the jury's advisory verdict in making its own findings,” and the Court of Appeals “reviews the district court's findings for clear error as if there had been no jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Loken, Kyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.