Cecil White v. Jacobs Engineering Group Long Term Disability Benefit Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding decision letter from adjuster stating only that “information in [its] file” indicated .claimant was “gainfully -employed” provided inadequate notice
• “When a benefits termination notice fails to explain the proper steps for appeal, the plan’s time bar is not triggered.”
• “When a benefits termination notice fails to explain the proper steps for appeal, the plan’s time bar is not triggered.”
• “[A]ppellant did not exhaust his administrative remedies, and jurisdiction in the district court was improperly granted.”
• “When a benefits termination notice fails to explain the proper steps for appeal, the plan’s time bar is not triggered”
• denial letter “informed White that he had 60 days to appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).