Mirza v. Insurance Administrator of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an administrator’s failure to include the time limit on seeking judicial review of an adverse benefit determination violates 28 U.S.C. § 1133
• reasoning that the use of “including” signified that “civil actions are logically one of the review procedures envisioned by the Department of Labor”
• reasoning that the use of “including” signified that “civil actions are logically one of the review procedures envisioned by the Department of Labor”
• borrowing state statute of limitations for contract claims where the plan administrator’s regulatory violation rendered, the plan’s limitations period not triggered
• “One of the purposes of 29 U.S.C. § 1133 . . . is to provide claimants with adequate information to ensure effective judicial review.”
• “[The defendant] first denied the claim on June 2, 2010, explaining that supporting documentation was missing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).