Western Radio Services Company, Inc. v. Michael Espy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying claim that the Forest Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously by following a procedure that did not comply with the guidelines in its Manual and Handbook
• denying claim that the Forest Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously by following a procedure that did not comply with the guidelines in its Manual and Handbook
• stating, in its determination that two agency documents did not satisfy the Eclectus Parrots test, that “[n]either [document] is published in the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations”
• “[W]e will review an agency’s alleged noncompliance with an agency pronouncement only if that pronouncement actually has the force and effect of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).