Amato v. Bernard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there are occasions when the exhaustion requirement does not apply, particularly where “resort to the administrative route is futile”
• holding that “federal courts have the authority to enforce the exhaustion requirement in suits under ERISA, and that as a matter of sound policy they should usually do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).