Skip to main content
· 4/29/1997

J.W. Counts v. American General Life And Accident Insurance Company

Citations

  • 111 F.3d 105
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that attorney's letters contesting aspects of benefit denial sent four and ten months after sixty-day appeal period expired constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies
  • observing that attorney's letters contesting aspects of benefit denial sent four and ten months after sixty-day appeal period expired constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies
  • affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment where district court refused to excuse a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
  • “[T]he usual remedy [for a technical violation is] . . . remand to the plan administrator for an out-of-time administrative appeal.” (cleaned up)
  • “The law is clear in this circuit that plaintiffs in ERISA actions must exhaust available administrative remedies before suing in federal court.”
  • “We have consistently stated that the exhaustion requirement applies both to actions to enforce a statutory right under ERISA and to actions brought to recover benefits under a plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.