· 4/29/1997
J.W. Counts v. American General Life And Accident Insurance Company
Citations
- 111 F.3d 105
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that attorney's letters contesting aspects of benefit denial sent four and ten months after sixty-day appeal period expired constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies
- observing that attorney's letters contesting aspects of benefit denial sent four and ten months after sixty-day appeal period expired constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies
- affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment where district court refused to excuse a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
- “[T]he usual remedy [for a technical violation is] . . . remand to the plan administrator for an out-of-time administrative appeal.” (cleaned up)
- “The law is clear in this circuit that plaintiffs in ERISA actions must exhaust available administrative remedies before suing in federal court.”
- “We have consistently stated that the exhaustion requirement applies both to actions to enforce a statutory right under ERISA and to actions brought to recover benefits under a plan”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.