Flinders v. Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[i]f the plan administrator failed to make adequate 22 factual findings or failed to adequately explain the grounds for the decision, then the proper remedy is to remand the case for further findings or additional explanation”
• overruled on other grounds, Holcomb v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 578 F.3d 1187, 1192-93 (10' Cir. 2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).