District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/16/1988
Carr v. Carr
Citations
- 522 So. 2d 880
- 1988 WL 13244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding error in trial court's exclusion from marital assets of the tangible assets of husband's medical practice, including accounts receivable
- finding error in trial court's exclusion, from marital assets, of the tangible assets of husband's medical practice, including accounts receivable
- finding error in the trial court’s exclusion of the tangible assets of husband’s medical practice, such as cash on hand, furniture and fixtures, and accounts receivable, from marital assets
- finding error in trial court's exclusion of accounts receivable from marital assets
- reversing trial court's order that treated husband's pension plan as source of payment for alimony rather than marital asset, because the husband had no present need for the benefits to fulfill his alimony obligations he was currently employed
- failure to consider pensions as distributable marital property is reversible error; disproportionate award cannot be justified by support obligation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Turner v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-20· cited 27×
- McLean v. McLeanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-10· cited 24×
- Layeni v. LayeniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 22×
- Villaverde v. VillaverdeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-13· cited 13×
- Thomas v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-16· cited 12×
- Sinclair v. SinclairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 12×
- Atkins v. AtkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-31· cited 12×
- Moebus v. MoebusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-28· cited 10×
- Steinberg v. SteinbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-13· cited 8×
- Bujarski v. BujarskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-28· cited 8×
- Carroll v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-05· cited 8×
- Fontana v. FontanaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-27· cited 7×
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-18· cited 7×
- Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-24· cited 5×
- Staman v. StamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-16· cited 4×
- Knecht v. KnechtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-25· cited 4×
- Harper v. HarperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-30· cited 4×
- Parisi v. MirandaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-22· cited 3×
- Littleton v. LittletonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-16· cited 3×
- Teague v. TeagueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 179×
- Crapps v. CrappsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-13· cited 21×
- Ward v. WardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-27· cited 21×
- Halberg v. HalbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-22· cited 18×
- Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-17· cited 18×
- DiPrima v. DiPrimaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-07· cited 12×
- Dewberry v. DewberryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-20· cited 8×
- Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 7×
- Holcomb v. HolcombDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-29· cited 6×
- Hobart v. HobartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.