Holcomb v. Holcomb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because wife did not receive house as lump sum alimony she was entitled to share in husband's retirement plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waldman v. Waldman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 39×
• Carr v. Carr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 23×
• Lanier v. Lanier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 22×
• Womble v. Womble
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 11×
• Moebus v. Moebus
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-28· cited 10×
• Whitley v. Whitley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-13· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 179×
• Buttner v. Buttner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 28×
• G'sell v. G'sell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-05· cited 14×
• Condren v. Condren
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 13×
• Mundy v. Mundy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-20· cited 12×
• Allison v. Allison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 8×
• Neumann v. Neumann
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-30· cited 7×
• Maloy v. Maloy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-25· cited 4×