District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/20/1988
Turner v. Turner
Citations
- 529 So. 2d 1138
- 1988 WL 36087
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court may reverse and remand with directions to take additional evidence as is necessary to render detailed findings sufficient to enable proper review
- lump sum alimony justified where, inter alia, special reason exists
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joanos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moon v. MoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 33×
- Borchard v. BorchardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-12· cited 30×
- Hanks v. HanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-06· cited 25×
- Eckroade v. EckroadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-02· cited 21×
- Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-31· cited 19×
- Sanders v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-15· cited 19×
- Massis v. MassisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-01· cited 15×
- Miceli v. MiceliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-03· cited 15×
- Glover v. GloverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-23· cited 15×
- Rogers v. MitziDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-15· cited 13×
- Villaverde v. VillaverdeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-13· cited 13×
- Thomas v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-16· cited 12×
- Pagano v. PaganoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-03· cited 11×
- Becker v. BeckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-15· cited 10×
- Bujarski v. BujarskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-28· cited 8×
- Strickler v. StricklerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-24· cited 8×
- Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-31· cited 7×
- Kelley v. KelleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-16· cited 6×
- Pfleger v. PflegerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-21· cited 6×
- Harris v. State, Dept. of Admin.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-03· cited 5×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-26· cited 179×
- Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-04-12· cited 97×
- Brown v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-09-10· cited 75×
- Marriage of Cain v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-04-12· cited 64×
- MacDonald v. MacDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-11-02· cited 54×
- DePoorter v. DePoorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 42×
- Rosen v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-05· cited 36×
- Brunson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1978-08-04· cited 34×
- Buttner v. ButtnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 28×
- Gardner v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-14· cited 27×
- In Re Marriage of ReedAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-25· cited 26×
- Carr v. CarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 23×
- Barrs v. BarrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-10· cited 23×
- In Re the Marriage of WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-08-27· cited 22×
- Keller v. KellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-03· cited 22×
- Crapps v. CrappsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-13· cited 21×
- Ashe v. AsheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-30· cited 20×
- Danoff v. DanoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-28· cited 16×
- Pardue v. PardueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.