Layeni v. Layeni

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred by failing to consider automobile benefits paid on behalf of the former husband as income under section 61.30(2)(a)(13)
• using “maintain” when the party had a pre-existing life insurance policy at the time of the order
• applying an “appropriate circumstances” standard instead of a “special circumstances” standard
• “Rehabilitative alimony cannot be awarded absent a rehabilitative plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).