District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/31/1992
Atkins v. Atkins
Citations
- 611 So. 2d 570
- 1992 WL 387437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding alimony award amount of $750 per month was inadequate where former husband's monthly net income was $7668 and former wife's was $1,050
- approving award of permanent alimony, but reversing because amount was insufficient, to 41-year-old wife of 17-year marriage producing no children
- reversing as inadequate alimony award of $750 per month where husband's net monthly income was $7,668 and wife's was $1,050 per month
- “[T]he trial court found that ‘the Wife’s financial affidavit is significantly inflated’ ..., and there is ample evidence to support such a finding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kennedy v. KennedyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 43×
- Zinovoy v. ZinovoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-29· cited 20×
- Bacon v. BaconDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-26· cited 14×
- Griffin v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
- Winn v. WinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-22· cited 7×
- Burrill v. BurrillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 7×
- Thrift v. ThriftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-16· cited 6×
- Bucknam v. SheltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-25· cited 4×
- Rosen v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03· cited 4×
- Reddell v. ReddellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-01· cited 3×
- Tammy Lynn Rhoads, Wife v. John M. Rhoads, HusbandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-21· cited 1×
- Hirth v. HirthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Kuvin v. KuvinSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-12-08· cited 100×
- Vandergriff v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 43×
- Carr v. CarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 23×
- Lanier v. LanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 22×
- Moore v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-10· cited 20×
- Prom v. PromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-04· cited 20×
- Pirino v. PirinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 18×
- Antonini v. AntoniniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-14· cited 17×
- Sweeney v. SweeneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-29· cited 16×
- Wright v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-29· cited 15×
- Sinclair v. SinclairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 12×
- Ervin v. ErvinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-14· cited 11×
- Zipperer v. ZippererDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-04· cited 11×
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-18· cited 7×
- Pill v. PillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 6×
- Pill v. PillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.