Fifth Circuit· 1/6/2023
Cargill v. Garland
Citations
- 57 F.4th 447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the National Firearms Act unambiguously “requires that a machinegun be capable of firing automatically once the trigger performs a single function”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court· 2024-06-28· cited 307×
- United States v. VargasFifth Circuit· 2023-07-24· cited 45×
- Mock v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-08-01· cited 34×
- Garland v. CargillSupreme Court· 2024-06-14· cited 33×
- Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDAFifth Circuit· 2023-08-16· cited 26×
- VanDerStok v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-11-09· cited 12×
- United States v. LamartiniereFifth Circuit· 2024-05-06· cited 9×
- Scott Hardin v. ATFSixth Circuit· 2023-04-25· cited 6×
- United States v. NazerzadehFifth Circuit· 2023-07-11· cited 5×
- United States v. NorthingtonFifth Circuit· 2023-08-09· cited 2×
- NA of Mftr v. SECFifth Circuit· 2024-06-26· cited 2×
- United States v. James ChandlerThird Circuit· 2024-08-22· cited 1×
- Mexican Gulf v. U.S. Dept. of CommFifth Circuit· 2023-02-27
- Damien Guedes v. ATF (ORDER IN SLIP OPINION FORMAT)D.C. Circuit· 2023-05-02
- State of Texas v. EPAFifth Circuit· 2024-01-11
- Garland v. Cargill Revisions: 6/14/24Supreme Court· 2024-06-14
- Garland v. Cargill Revisions: 6/17/24Supreme Court· 2024-06-14
- Edith Okechukwu Omietimi v. Texas Board of NursingTex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2025-05-28
- United States v. PheasantNinth Circuit· 2025-10-31
- Neumann's Pharmacy v. DEAFifth Circuit· 2026-02-13
Cites
68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- United States v. BassSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 1,739×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 1,067×
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court· 2018-05-21· cited 946×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 812×
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 742×
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentD.C. Circuit· 1983-08-12· cited 680×
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 673×
- United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court· 2014-03-26· cited 648×
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-12-15· cited 631×
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 631×
- Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court· 2012-05-29· cited 542×
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-03-09· cited 514×
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court· 2015-03-09· cited 475×
Other cases named Cargill v. Garland
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.